Thousands of devices and hundreds of platforms keep flooding the Internet-of-Things market, however, efforts to enable flexible integration and create a unified infrastructure look disparate and inconsistent limiting the potential and hindering the dynamics of the field. What complicates things even further is that tracking devices of today send a lot more than just location coordinates supporting video streaming and other advanced functions.
Currently at $20 bln, the size of commercial telematics market is forecasted to reach $45-55 bln by 2022. Another analytics agency, Allied Market Research, is even more optimistic predicting the size of connected cars market to hit $141 bln in 2025. Forbes estimates the size of IoT market at $267 bln by 2020. It is evident that people and companies alike are excited about connecting everything they can and the sci-fi future is looming in the distance, but in reality, we might still fail to connect a smartphone to a laptop via Bluetooth.
Aliaksei Shchurko, Chief Gurtam Architect, highlights the importance of facilitating connectivity between software platforms and GPS-enabled devices on the Telematics 2017 international conference in Minsk, Belarus on July 12-14:
Poor collaboration and undefined rules of the game in the telematics world pose a major hurdle hindering the development of the industry as a whole and its individual players in particular. It’s especially ironic in the field aiming to connect the world, which ideally implies that any two devices should be able to start communication without much hustle.
According to IoT Analytics Agency, as of June 2017, there are 450 IoT platforms on the market. The number of unique end-devices is in its thousands, and those keep enriching their functionality thus forcing continuous improvements in the communication protocols.
The current disparity and lack of concordance in IoT can be explained by the following factors:
- Multitude of players. New software and hardware solutions by existing and emerging companies hit the shelves every month making the number of things to bring together grow exponentially
- Rapid market expansion. In such a relatively young and undefined market as IoT, it is hard to stay in sync with all changes and new developments occurring across the globe
- Rivalry. Keeping devices and software incompatible with the competition increases switching costs for the customer thus discouraging them from parting ways with the company
- All or nothing dilemma. It only makes sense to be in the business of integration services if you provide support for virtually every device on the market and stay up-to-date, which is extremely complicated and resource-demanding.
The ways out of the current situation are common-sense in theory but non-trivial in terms of implementation:
- one way is to engage platform developers and end-device manufacturers to join forces and work closer together, e.g. by founding an independent alliance
- an alternative is to use specialized third-party software designed to bridge the gap and handle the bi-directional communication between all kinds of connected devices and business applications via multiple protocols.
Even though the vision of IoT is somewhat misty, we can state with confidence that sensors will eventually sit on anything big enough to carry them, so in order to ensure instant reliable interaction between any two things solid scalable infrastructure is vitally important.
Insights From the Telematics 2018 Conference
flespi team held a small survey for the participants of the annual Telematics conference to see what businesses in the field need and how it aligns with our vision of the product.
Wialon & flespi — Seven Common Use Cases to Join Forces
Many standard situations that Wialon users face can be resolved easier by plugging flespi in the infrastructure. Here are a few best practices where flespi adds value and eliminates hassle.